nfographic outlining internet sex crimes in Florida, showing how online solicitation, undercover sting operations, chat evidence, and device searches are used in prosecutions under Florida law.
You are here: Home > Sex Crimes > 🧱Internet and Computer Sex Crimes in Florida

🧱Internet and Computer Sex Crimes in Florida

Last updated January 2026

Internet and computer-based sex crime allegations are among the fastest-growing and most aggressively prosecuted offenses in Florida. These cases often involve undercover sting operations, digital communications, seized devices, and complex forensic evidence — long before formal charges are filed.

Unlike traditional sex crime allegations, internet sex crime cases frequently turn on intent, knowledge, and how digital evidence was obtained and interpreted. A single misstep early in an investigation can dramatically increase exposure.

If you are under investigation or have been arrested for an internet sex crime in Fort Lauderdale or South Florida, early legal intervention is critical.

🔍 What Are Internet Sex Crimes Under Florida Law?

Internet sex crimes involve alleged sexual offenses committed or facilitated through electronic means, including computers, smartphones, messaging apps, social media platforms, and file-sharing networks.

These cases are commonly charged under a combination of:

  • Florida statutes

  • Federal statutes

  • Task-force investigations involving state and federal agencies

👉 For a broader overview, see our guide to sex crimes in Florida.

⚖️ Common Internet & Computer Sex Crime Charges

🔸 Online Solicitation of a Minor

Allegations involving electronic communication with someone believed to be a minor for unlawful purposes.

  • Often initiated through undercover law-enforcement profiles

  • Frequently charged before any in-person contact occurs

🔸 Traveling to Meet a Minor

Charges may be filed when police allege someone traveled — or attempted to travel — to meet a minor after online communication.

  • Frequently paired with solicitation charges

  • Heavy reliance on chat logs and intent evidence

🔸 Undercover Sting Operations

Many internet sex crime cases originate from sting operations conducted by:

  • Local law-enforcement agencies

  • Multi-agency task forces

  • Federal authorities

These cases raise serious questions about:

  • Entrapment

  • Inducement

  • Predisposition

🔸 Transmission of Harmful Material to a Minor

Allegations involving sending images, videos, or explicit communications electronically.

  • Can include texts, social media, or messaging apps

  • Often overlaps with sexting-related offenses

🖥️ Possession or Distribution of CSAM (Sexual Performance by a Child)

Florida law refers to these offenses as sexual performance by a child under § 827.071, commonly known in search terms as “child pornography.”

These cases are aggressively prosecuted and often involve:

  • Search warrants for electronic devices

  • Digital forensic examinations

  • Allegations of possession, viewing, saving, or sharing files

Florida Charges

  • Possession is typically charged as a felony offense

  • Each image or file may be charged separately

  • Convictions can trigger mandatory sex-offender registration

Federal Exposure

Many cases are referred to federal authorities under:

  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252 and 2252A

Federal cases often carry:

  • Mandatory minimum prison sentences

  • Significantly higher sentencing exposure

  • Prosecution by the FBI, Homeland Security, or U.S. Attorney’s Office

🔎 Digital Evidence, Devices, and Forensic Analysis

Internet sex crime cases often hinge on how digital evidence was obtained and analyzed.

Key issues include:

  • Legality of search warrants

  • Scope of device searches

  • Cloud storage and synced accounts

  • Metadata interpretation

  • Auto-downloads, caching, or background processes

  • Shared devices or accounts

👉 Learn more about illegal search and seizure in Florida and how digital evidence can be challenged.

🛡️ Common Defenses to Internet Sex Crime Allegations

Effective defenses depend on the facts, but often include:

🔹 Lack of Intent or Knowledge

The State must prove knowing and intentional conduct — not accidental downloads, auto-cached files, or misunderstood communications.

🔹 Entrapment

In sting operations, police must prove predisposition, not that they persuaded or pressured someone into conduct they otherwise would not have engaged in.

🔹 Unlawful Searches and Seizures

Overbroad warrants, improper device seizures, or warrantless searches can result in suppression of key evidence.

🔹 Misinterpretation of Digital Evidence

Digital files may be:

  • Corrupted

  • Misidentified

  • Never intentionally accessed

  • Automatically generated

Forensic conclusions are frequently challengeable.

⚠️ What to Do If You’re Being Investigated

If you believe you are under investigation for an internet sex crime:

  • Do not speak to law enforcement without an attorney

  • Do not consent to device searches

  • Do not attempt to explain or “clear things up”

  • Preserve potentially exculpatory evidence

Early legal intervention can prevent charges from being filed or limit exposure.

📞 Internet Sex Crime Defense in Fort Lauderdale

At Michael White, P.A., we defend individuals accused of internet and computer sex crimes throughout Fort Lauderdale and South Florida.

We understand:

  • Digital-forensic investigations

  • Sting-operation tactics

  • Federal and state charging decisions

📞 Call (954) 270-0769 or request a confidential consultation today.